CLIMATE NEUTRALITY (PHRASES AND BUZZWORDS IN MEDIA AND POLITICS)

In recent years, I have noticed that in politics (together with the media) people often use phrases, trendy words and buzzwords, and I would like to warn against adopting them without thinking.

Recently I read again a word without meaning: „Climate Neutrality“ (in connection with CO2).

The word is a pure propaganda creation without sense or logic. How can a politician presume to decide for nature what is neutral, what is too much or too little.

CO2 is a gas that plants need to grow. At present, according to science, we have 0.04% CO2 in the air. This is a relatively low percentage compared to other periods in Earth’s history when there was comparatively high CO2 in the atmosphere and therefore tremendous plant growth.

We should therefore do everything else but try to reduce the proportion of CO2 even further.

The broken red line represents the amount of CO2, the broken blue line the amount of O2 in the air today.

An important question in this context:

„Why do politicians, the media and science lie to us all the time – and why do most people nevertheless believe and trust them over and over again? WHY?

What can the goal of these practices be other than something evil? And why do schoolchildren and students also fall for these tricks?“


Ein Kommentar zu „CLIMATE NEUTRALITY (PHRASES AND BUZZWORDS IN MEDIA AND POLITICS)

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s